
“Hmm… Quite the interesting one…Seven must be last, being seen as the luckiest. It seven isn’t the oldest, then that must be nine? Though… saying the youngest couldn’t never is a double negative. Don’t know if that was intentional or not, considering the youngest has to be in between two higer numbers… Unless ‘showing how it’s done’ only applied to seven, and the younger really does beat all the older numbers. With how it’s written, I’d hazard seven in last, nine in third, five in second, and three in first. Though, that said, problems come up depending on whether you use three and five, five and one, or three and one…. So many possible problems in wording… but I’ll go 7953 last to first for now.”